It took just over three years for the application to be considered; on April 15, 1966, a decree by the French Ministry of State for Cultural Affairs registered Les Serres “among the picturesque sites” in the department. A week later, a rave article in the daily newspaper Nice-Matin hailed “the man who bought a pile of overgrown ruins a few years ago and managed to revive the splendor of old...utilizing all the sophistication of science for the cause of art and truth.” From then on, Les Serres became part of an “educational tour” for associations, clubs and high school classes. “Mr. Paulvé most kindly showed us round his estate. Man and nature have joined forces here to make a kind of masterpiece, where beauty and utility live together in harmony,” wrote the Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et d’Archéologie de Toulon et du Var in its July-August 1966 issue. “Factories are not incompatible with the protection of nature, pupils from Lorgues high school witnessed a fine example at Mr. Paulvé’s factory in Le Muy,” said the headline in Le Provençal on March 26, 1971.
[…] By then, Paulvé had been in Les Serres for ten years. The SEPP employed forty people.
[…] Yet Paulvé had detractors in Les Serres as well. Paulvé and his factory would move, but not until 1982 and not very far from Les Serres either, to a 13-hectare plot purchased in 1974 in the neighboring village of La Motte that now houses his two companies, since taken over by an international group.
[…] Silence returned to the hamlet. The workshops were closed down, some of the machinery was moved out. Marcel Paulvé went to live in Cannes and the mill, the empty factory shell and the grounds were put up for sale. Just two of his former employees, Laszlo and Marika Szalaï, stayed behind, to take care of welcoming potential buyers.
[…] Silence returned to the hamlet. The workshops were closed down, some of the machinery was moved out. Marcel Paulvé went to live in Cannes and the mill, the empty factory shell and the grounds were put up for sale. Just two of his former employees, Laszlo and Marika Szalaï, stayed behind, to take care of welcoming potential buyers.
One day in the fall of 1988, a man named Francis Venet arrived at Les Serres. He had just retired and his “little brother” Bernar had given him a mission: to find a property where he could spend the summer and permanently store part of his contemporary art collection and his works.
Francis Venet visited over twenty properties between the Côte d’Azur and the foothills of the Alps. Ten or so struck him as being interesting enough to house Bernar’s project. On visiting them, Bernar gave each a mark “out of ten,” like a schoolmaster. He instantly awarded Les Serres a “nine,” because it was “a little pricey” and because there’s no such thing as perfection.
Five years of dereliction had left their mark. The mill, which had been restored in “rustic-Renaissance” style (in 1959, Jean Marais shot a scene of the film The Hunchback of Paris here), was barely inhabitable and the factory was still cluttered with spare parts, cables, and pipes. While the “dark, old-fashioned” building had only moderate appeal for Bernar, discovering the factory was a “shock”: this huge space, with its exceptionally high ceiling, vast windows streaming with daylight, and reinforced floor designed to carry the heaviest machines, was exactly what the artist was looking for. At the time it merely had “potential” that could be fulfilled with “time and work.”
The bill of sale was signed on June 20, 1989 and major conversion work started almost immediately. The mill and the factory were entirely painted white and Bernar created a special set of steel furniture that contrasts spectacularly with the dark wood in the mill. Diane did a lot to moderate her husband’s overtly “minimalist” demands: the soul of Les Serres owes a good deal to her indubitable taste.
Over four hundred trees were planted to preen and screen the site... later a building designed to be a gallery was built by two young architects, Charles Berthier and David Llamata, and a 22-meter-long “bridge”—a Cor-ten steel structure dotted with “random holes”—was laid across the Nartuby.
1989–2009: the “potential” has been fulfilled, despite the artist objecting to the “stable state” that he links to death, though the story here is only just beginning. The mill, the factory and the river—which once again powers the turbine of the electric generator—have gone back to being working tools. Les Serres said it loud and clear to the artist twenty years ago, when Laszlo and Marika first opened the door to the factory: this place is not a vacation.
“I like to use the term ‘factory,’” says Bernar. It is a word he has always heard: his parents, brothers, childhood friends and neighbors in Saint-Auban-sur-Durance always worked at “the factory.” The “factory” is where the scrawny child who marveled at Rembrandt, Cézanne, and Paul Klee was destined to end up.
The factory at Le Muy is not the one in Saint-Auban. But it is not an entirely foreign territory either. On the banks of the Nartuby, like the banks of the Durance, men have thrown all their weight and creative energy into wielding willpower over matter. What appeals to Bernar here is the patient, stubborn labor of men—artists and workers alike. The factory at Le Muy is not the one in Saint-Auban. But it is not an entirely foreign territory either. On the banks of the Nartuby, like the banks of the Durance, men have thrown all their weight and creative energy into wielding willpower over matter. What appeals to Bernar here is the patient, stubborn labor of men—artists and workers alike.
Robert Arnoux
Translated from French to English by John O’Toole
Excerpt from « Vingt ans après », by Robert Arnoux, published in Robert Arnoux,
Bernar Venet: L’expérience du Muy, Somogy, Paris, France, 2009, pp. 14-29.